检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王俭[1] 贾文霄[2] 陈宏[1] 米日古丽·沙依提[1] 刘文亚[1] 温浩
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院影像中心,乌鲁木齐830054 [2]新疆医科大学第二附属医院放射科 [3]新疆包虫病临床研究所
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》2009年第4期402-405,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨MR水成像(MRH)技术在泡状棘球蚴病临床诊断中的作用。方法搜集34例临床怀疑为泡状棘球蚴病的患者,其中32例经手术和病理证实为泡状棘球蚴包虫病,均行常规MR和MRH检查,以病理结果为金标准,比较两种方法的灵敏性、特异性和准确性。2种方法结果符合率的比较采用U检验。结果32例泡状棘球蚴病患者的128个病灶中,常规MRI检查发现68个、MRH发现108个。常规MRI检查泡状棘球蚴的灵敏性为(53.13±0.04)%,特异性为(92.59±0.05)%,符合率为(60.00±0.03)%;MRH检查泡状棘球蚴病灶的灵敏度为(84.38±0.03)%,特异度(81.48±0.08)%,符合率为(83.87±0.03)%,常规MRI和MRH符合率比较,差异具有统计学意义(U=5.44,P〈0.01)。结论MRH技术可以提高泡状棘球蚴病病灶检出的灵敏性和符合率。Objective To investigate the clinical application of MR hydrography (MRH) in diagnosing alveolar echinococcosis (AE). Methods Thirty-four patients with suspected alveolar echinococcosis were examined using MRH in addition to conventional magnetic resonance imaging(cMRI). Thirty-two of the 34 patinets had surgery and the pathological diagnoses were alveolar echinococcosis. Results Among 128 lesions in these 32 patients found at surgery, cMRI examination found 68 lesions and MRH found 108 lesions. The sensitivity of cMRI examination was (53. 13 ± 0. 04)% , the specificity was (92. 59 ± 0. 05) % , concordance rate was ( 60. 00 ± 0. 03 ) %. The sensitivity of MRH examination was ( 84. 38 ± 0. 03)%, the specificity was (81.48 ± 0. 08)%, concordance rate was (83.87 ± 0. 03)%. Comparing concordance rate of cMRI examination and MRH, significant difference was found ( U = 5.44, P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion MRH technique can raise the sensitivity and concordance rate for diagnosing AE. This technique should be employed in the evaluation of patients suspected of AE.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147