论环境法益及其刑法保护  

On the Environmental Legal Benefits and Their Protection by Criminal Law

作　　者：贾学胜[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学法学院,广州510632

出　　处：《常熟理工学院学报》2009年第3期54-59,共6页Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology

基　　金：暨南大学人文社会科学发展基金项目"公害犯罪的刑法规制研究"(006JSYJ043)

摘　　要：现行刑法以传统法益作为环境法益的核心内容不利于环境保护,应将环境法益界定为既包括人类环境利益,也包括部分生态环境利益。以刑事政策上的环境法益为评判依据,我国刑法对环境法益的保护有诸多缺陷,应从扩大环境要素的保护范围、设置危险犯构造的环境犯罪、规定责任推定原则和采用特殊的追诉时效四个方面,对刑法中关于环境犯罪的规定予以完善。It is non-beneficial to the environment protection that the existing criminal law excludes environmental legal benefits, and actually both the interests of the human environment and the partial ecological benefits should be included in environmental legal benefits. There are many loopholes in the criminal law to protect environmental legal benefits, and the following four areas should be improved in order to improve the definition of environmental crimes： to expand the protection scope of environmental elements; to prescribe environmental crimes by potential criminals; to prescribe principles for the presumption of duty and to determine a special limitation of prosecution.

关 键 词：环境法益 环境要素 危险犯 责任推定 追诉时效 

分 类 号：DF622[政治法律—刑法学]