《资本论》与历史科学的新发现——对阿尔都塞《读〈资本论〉》的再思考  

Capital and the New Discovery of Historical Science:Restudying of Althusser's Reading Capital

作　　者：仰海峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系

出　　处：《哲学研究》2009年第3期10-17,共8页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：Althusser believed that Capital has opened the door to historical science.Marx’s Capital criticized the humanist philosophical method of classical political economy,so Marx’s historical science can’t be understood as a theory of historicism which is another kind of manifestation of humanist ideology.In Marx’s historical science,history is a process of non-subjcet,and the multivariate determinism taking the mode of production as ultimate determinant is the mode of understanding the whole of history.Althusser’s discussions emphasized the philosophical methodology in Capital,but it is still a problem both to Althusser and to us today that how to understand Capital from Marx’s fusion of philosophy,the political economy,and the scientific socialism.Althusser believed that Capital has opened the door to historical science.Marx's Capital criticized the humanist philosophical method of classical political economy,so Marx's historical science can't be understood as a theory of historicism which is another kind of manifestation of humanist ideology.In Marx's historical science,history is a process of non-subjcet,and the multivariate determinism taking the mode of production as ultimate determinant is the mode of understanding the whole of history.Althusser's discussions emphasized the philosophical methodology in Capital,but it is still a problem both to Althusser and to us today that how to understand Capital from Marx's fusion of philosophy,the political economy,and the scientific socialism.

关 键 词：《资本论》 阿尔都塞 历史科学 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》 《德意志意识形态》 人本主义思潮 马克思 金融危机 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论] F0-0[经济管理—政治经济学]