检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京工商大学法学院,北京100048 [2]武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉433000
出 处:《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第2期73-79,共7页JOURNAL OF BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY:SOCIAL SCIENCES
摘 要:我国加入WTO之后,随着国际贸易范围的不断扩大,与商标权有关的商标产品的平行进口现象日趋增加。理论上对商标产品平行进口行为的性质一直争论不休;实践中,相关国际公约没有明确具体规定,我国有关立法也处于空白。本文在分析商标权的独立性和地域性的基础上,结合主要国家或地区的相关立法与实践,提出商标产品的平行进口行为,对于进口国的商标权人具有明显的侵权性。我国应在商标法中明确规定禁止商标产品的平行进口,以严格保护商标权人的合法权益;同时还应有例外规定,以适应全球贸易自由化的趋势。After China's accession to WTO, with the expansion of the scope of international trade, the parallel importation of trademark-related products has been increasing. In theory, there has been endless debates on the nature of parallel importation of trademark-related products. In practice, there are no specific provisions on this subject in relevant international conventions. China's national legislation is almost in blank. Based on the analysis of independence and locality of trademark rights, combined with the experiences of the legislation and the enforcement in other major countries and regions, this article asserts that the parallel importation of trademark-related products is an infringement on the bearer of trademark right in the import country. Therefore, China should prohibit the parallel importation of trademark products clearly in the Trademark Law to protect the legitimate interests of the hearer of trademark right. Meanwhile, there should also be necessary exceptions in order to adapt to the liberalization of world trade.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43