聚焦超声与微波治疗常年变应性鼻炎疗效比较  

Compared the therapeutic effect between focused ultrasound and microwave treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

作　　者：杜经纬[1] 张丽[1] 王丽洪[1] 王智彪[2] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院耳鼻咽喉科,400016 [2]重庆医科大学生物医学工程系重庆市生物医学工程学重点实验室重庆市超声医学工程重点实验室-省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,400016

出　　处：《重庆医科大学学报》2009年第3期339-341,共3页Journal of Chongqing Medical University

基　　金：重庆医科大学2005年创新基金(项目编号:重医大科[2005]8号CX200537)

摘　　要：目的:比较聚焦超声与微波治疗常年变应性鼻炎(Perenni alallergic rhinitis,PAR)临床疗效并探讨前者的优越性。方法:219例PAR患者随机分组,143例为治疗组,用CZB型鼻炎治疗仪治疗,76例为对照组,用微波治疗仪治疗。按照2004年兰州会议"变应性鼻炎的治疗原则和推荐方案",用记分法分别评定其疗效。结果:术后共随访12月,总有效率分别为:1月:治疗组97.9%,对照组94.7%(P>0.05);6月:治疗组89.5%,对照组85.5%(P>0.05);12月:治疗组81.1%,对照组68.4%(P<0.05)。结论:聚焦超声治疗常年变应性鼻炎,疗效更持久,注重保护鼻腔生理功能,安全性高、术后反应轻、恢复快,是一种值得推广的物理治疗方式。Objective ：To compare the clinical therapeutic effect between Focused Uhrasound and microwave treatment to PAR and to investigate the advantages of the former. Method：219 cases of PAR patients randomized, 143 were treated with CZB-therapeutic apparatus rhinitis treatment, 76 cases in the eontrol group using microwave therapy apparatus treatment. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by clinical symptoms controlled counting-scores, according to the Chinese Lan Zhou principle of treatment and recommendation program for allergic rhinitis （2004）. Result：A total of follow-up after 12 months,with a total effective rate are as follows： 1 month：97.9% in the treatment group and control group, 94.7%（P 〉 0.05）; 6 month：89.5% in the treatment group and control group, 85.5%（P 〉 0.05）; 12 month： 81.1% in the treatment group and control group, 68.4%（P〈0.05 ）. Conclusion：Focused Ultrasound treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis, a more lasting effect, pay attention to the protection of physiological function of the nasal cavity, safe, after light reaction and rapid recovely, is a worthwhile promotion of physical therapy.

关 键 词：聚焦超声 微波 变应性鼻炎 常年性 物理治疗 

分 类 号：R765.21[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]