检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北大学社会科学处,河北保定071002 [2]河北大学人文学院,河北保定071002
出 处:《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第2期30-32,共3页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
摘 要:马端临《文献通考》虽非专论《诗经》,但在《诗经》研究上独树一帜,不为时代风气所左右。马端临认为《诗序》的作者,既非孔子、子夏,亦非卫宏、国史,盖非一人之言。《诗序》的出现乃是或国史采录,或讲师传授的结果。在尊序废序问题上,马端临力主尊序,反对欧阳修、朱熹以来废序的做法,认为《诗序》对于《诗经》来说,不可或缺。Ma Duanlin's Wenxiantongkao is not a book features and is not influenced by the style of that time about the Book of Songs, but his study on it has its own Ma Duanlin believed that the author of the Rreface to the Book of Songs is not one person, such as Kongzi, Zixia, Weihong, or a historian. The Preface to the Book of Songs is either recorded by historians or taught by educators. As for observing it or abolishing it, Ma Duanlin insists on the former and objects to O Yangxiu and Zhu Xi's opinions. He argues that the Preface to the Book of Songs is indispensable to the Book of Songs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15