检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘飞[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学法学院
出 处:《中国法学》2009年第2期12-21,共10页China Legal Science
摘 要:在我国"全能政府"的传统治理模式难以满足社会发展需求的情势之下,民营化已经成为了一种现实的选择。民营化的范围可以包括由民间主体参与履行行政任务和提供公共服务的所有方式在内。作为一种国家与私人之间在"执行责任"上的分担模式,民营化并不会导致国家的"保障责任"发生变化。从理论上而言,民营化的推进应当有其界限,但是具体的界限还有待于明确。民营化的推进对我国传统行政方式和行政目标、政府传统监管制度、政府行政能动性、现有权利救济途径等都构成了冲击。行政法应当如何回应这一挑战,还有待于进一步的考察才能得出结论。Where it is difficuh for the traditional mode of administration by the "Almighty Government" to cater to the needs for social development, privatization has become a realistic alternative. Privatization includes all means by which non - governmental organizations participate in the implementation of administrative tasks and the offering of public services. Being a means of sharing the "responsibility for implementation", privatization will not lead to the change of government's "responsibility for guarantee". Theoretically, the promotion of privatization is supposed to have its boundary, which remains to be defined. The promotion of privatization constitutes a challenge to China's traditional administrative means, administrative aims, the government's traditional supervisory system, the government's administrative initiative, the present relief of rights, and so on. How the administrative law responds to such a challenge requires further investigation before a conclusion is drawn.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] G649.21[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229