检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市徐汇区中心医院针灸科,上海200031
出 处:《上海中医药杂志》2009年第4期46-48,共3页Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:上海市卫生局中医药科研基金资助项目(2005LD24A)
摘 要:目的观察特色水药罐治疗椎间盘源性腰痛的临床疗效。方法将62例患者随机分为两组,特色水药罐组(中药煎剂的药汁置于罐内,行拔罐法)32例,火罐组(传统拔火罐)30例,通过疼痛积分评定的变化进行疗效观察。结果两组患者治疗前后自身比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);治疗结束后1个月随访疼痛评分分别与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论两种疗法均能改善椎间盘源性下腰痛的症状,特色水药罐疗效好于火罐治疗。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of herbal cupping therapy for lumbago due to intervertebral disc diseases. Methods Sixty-two subjects were randomized into two groups : treatment group in which 32 cases were treated by herbal cupping therapy and control group in which 30 cases were treated by conventional cupping therapy ; the clinical efficacy was observed in terms of lumbago scores. Results Compared with before treatment, the clinical efficacy was fairly significant after treatment and one-month survey( p 〈0.01 ), with better efficacy in treatment group than in control group( P 〈0.01 ). Conclusion Both cupping therapies are effective against lumbago due to intervertebral disc diseases, but the herbal cupping therapy works better.
分 类 号:R244.3[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28