检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王文娟[1,2] 常禹[1] 刘志华[1,2] 陈宏伟[1,2] 荆国志 张红新 王金海
机构地区:[1]中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳110016 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100049 [3]大兴安岭呼中林业局,黑龙江呼中165036 [4]大兴安岭呼中国家级自然保护区,黑龙江呼中165036
出 处:《应用生态学报》2009年第4期773-778,共6页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(30670363,40871245);中国科学院重要方向项目(KZCXZ-YW-444)资助
摘 要:对大兴安岭呼中林区主要植被类型、兴安落叶松不同林型内粗木质残体贮量进行对比研究,并利用除趋势典范对应分析对其环境梯度进行定量分析.结果表明:云杉林粗木质残体贮量较高,为0.20m3·hm-2,且不同植被类型之间呈显著性差异;兴安落叶松不同林型粗木质残体贮量在0~0.28m3·hm-2,其中偃松群落最高,为0.28m3·hm-2,泥炭藓-杜香-落叶松林最低(0),且各林型之间差异不显著.粗木质残体贮量分布格局较复杂,受多因素交叉影响;海拔、坡位等地形因子和林分年龄、郁闭度等林分条件是影响森林粗木质残体贮量的主要环境因子,二者综合作用表达了该地区森林粗木质残体贮量的空间生态梯度.The coarse woody debris (CWD) loading capacity oi main lorest types and of different larch forest communities in Huzhong area of Great Xing'an Mountains was investigated, with its environmental gradient analyzed by Detrended Canonical Correspondence Analysis (DCCA). The CWD loading capacity varied significantly with forest type, being the highest (0. 20m^3·hm^-2) in spruce forest (Picea koraiensis). Different larch forest (Larix gmelinii) communities had a CWD loading capacity from 0 to 0. 28 m^3·hm^-2, with the highest in Pinus pumila-Larix gmelinii (0.28 m^3·hm^-2) and the lowest in Sphagnum magellanicum-Ledum palustre-Larix gmelinii (O), but the differences were not significant. The CWD loading capacity across the study area was complicated, which might result from the complex interplay of affecting factors. The main factors affecting the spatial pattern of the CWD loading capacity were topographic factors (elevation and slope position) and stand structure (age, canopy cover, and others), and the interaction between topographic factors and stand structure expressed the spatial gradient of CWD loading capacity in Huzhong area of Great Xing' an Mountains.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15