检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈卫华[1] 辛坤[1] 蔡臣安[1] 郝峰[1] 曹勇[1]
出 处:《中国针灸》2009年第4期272-274,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
摘 要:目的:比较中药穴位贴敷疗法与常规针刺治疗支气管哮喘的疗效差异。方法:将100例患者随机分为贴敷组和针刺组各50例。贴敷组应用三伏中药穴位贴敷治疗,穴取大椎、肺俞、膏肓、膻中、气海;针刺组于同期采用针刺疗法,穴取中府、天突、膻中、定喘、丰隆,观察两组远期疗效。结果:贴敷组总有效率为94.0%,针刺组总有效率为76.0%,两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:三伏天中药贴敷治疗支气管哮喘疗效明显优于常规针刺疗法。Objective To compare therapeutic effects of acupoint application of Chinese medicine and routine acupuncture on bronchial asthma. Methods One hundred cases were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 50 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with application of Chinese medicine at Dazhui (GV 14), Feishu (BL 13), Gaohuang (BL 43), Danzhong (CV 17), Qihai (CV 6) in the dog days; and the control group was treated with acupuncture at Zhongfu (LU 1), Tiantu (CV 22), Danzhong (CV 17), Dingchuan (EX-B 1), Fenglong (ST 40). The long-term therapeutic effects were observed. Results The total effective rate was 94.0% in the observation group and 76.0% in the control group with a significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of acupoint application of Chinese medicine in the dog days on bronchial asthma is significantly superior to that of routine acupuncture.
分 类 号:R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71