国际诉讼竞合之法律规制模式:效益分析与选择  

Legal Regulatory Models of International Parallel Litigation:Analysis of Beneficial Result and the Choice Thereof

作　　者：吴一鸣[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院国际经济法研究所 [2]南京审计学院法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2009年第2期135-142,共8页Global Law Review

摘　　要：国际诉讼竞合会产生诸多的消极后果:当事人沉重的经济负担、司法资源的浪费和矛盾的判决。然而,在某些情形下,当事人提起国际平行诉讼的行为也具有合法的动机。因此,对于国际诉讼竞合的法律规制应当以效益为价值取向,对国际诉讼竞合的消极后果和当事人的合法动机进行衡量,既要体现经济效率也要保护当事人的合法利益。目前世界上主要存在着四种不同的模式:放任平行诉讼模式、英美法系的自由裁量模式、大陆法系的承认预期模式和欧盟的先受理模式。中国应当以承认预期模式作为原则,以自由裁量模式作为例外。唯有此,才能实现最佳的效益目标。Duplicative proceedings have negative effects:waste of judicial resources,financial burden and contradictory judgments. But sometimes,parallel litigation is justified with legitimate reasons. Therefore,the beneficial result should be the value orientation of legal regulation of parallel litigation,which should balance the beneficial result against the party's legitimate interest. There are four different approaches in this respect:the laissez faire approach,the discretion approach,the recognition prognosis approach and the first seized approach. In China,proper approach should be taken to ensure the best beneficial result. The author's argument is that China should take the recognition prognosis approach as the principal approach and the discretion approach as the escaped clause.

关 键 词：国际诉讼竞合 法律规制 效益 

分 类 号：D997.3[政治法律—国际法学]