检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周利琳[1] 司升云[1] 汪钟信[2] 望勇[1] 刘小明[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉市蔬菜科学研究所,武汉430065 [2]华中农业大学植物科学技术学院,武汉430070
出 处:《昆虫学报》2009年第4期386-394,共9页Acta Entomologica Sinica
基 金:公益性行业((农业)科研专项经费项目“甜菜夜蛾防控技术研究与示范”(200803007)
摘 要:为了解甜菜夜蛾Spodoptera exigua(Hbner)对虫酰肼的抗性生化机制,采用活体测定法测定了甜菜夜蛾虫酰肼敏感种群、汰选种群和武汉自然种群体内解毒酶[羧酸酯酶(CarE)和谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶(GSTs)]、保护酶[过氧化氢酶(CAT)、过氧化物酶(POD)和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)]以及与表皮形成相关的表皮酚氧化酶(PO)和几丁质酶的活性。结果表明:汰选种群和自然种群CarE比活力分别是敏感种群的1.20和2.67倍,GSTs比活力分别是敏感种群的2.34和0.96倍。汰选种群CarE的Km值与敏感种群相比差异显著,但Vmax值无明显差异;自然种群Km值和Vmax值与敏感种群、汰选种群均存在极显著差异。酯酶同工酶电泳酶谱在迁移率、谱带数目、酶带染色深浅等方面均存在明显差异,分析结果与CarE活力测定、酶动力学研究结果相符。与敏感种群相比,汰选种群CAT和POD比活力差异不显著,SOD比活力显著增高;自然种群3种酶比活力均显著增高;自然种群和汰选种群均是SOD酶活力的变化较CAT和POD明显。汰选种群PO和几丁质酶比活力比敏感种群分别上升了37.64%和27.37%,自然种群比活力分别上升了59.63%和60.29%。自然种群和汰选种群PO酶动力学常数均与敏感种群存在显著差异。In order to explore the biochemical mechanisms of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Htibner), resistance to tebufenozide, activities of detoxifying enzymes including carboxylesterase (CarE) and glutathione-S-transferases ( GSTs), protective enzymes including catalase ( CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide (SOD), and phenoloxidase (PO) and chitinase were tested in vivo in the susceptible population, selected population and natural population in Wuhan. The results showed that CarE activities of the selected population and natural population were 1.20- and 2.67-fold, and GSTs activities were 2.34- and O. 96-fold, respectively, compared with the susceptible population. There were significant differences in Km values of the CarE but no significant differences in Vmox values between the selected population and susceptible population. Compared with the selected population and susceptible population, the natural population had highly significant differences in Km and Vmax values of the CarE. PAGE results of the esterase isozymes also proved that the CarE activities and kinetic constants had changed dramatically. There were no significant differences in CAT and POD activities between the selected population and susceptible population, but SOD activity of the selected population increased obviously. Meanwhile the activities of the three enzymes in natural population also increased remarkably. The changes of SOD activities were more significant than those of CAT and POD activities. The PO and chitinase activities of the selected population increased 37.64% and 27.37%, respectively, and that of the natural population increased 59.63% and 60.29%, respectively, compared with the susceptible population. The kinetic constants of PO in the natural population and selected population had significant differences from those in the susceptible population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3