检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董柏青[1] 刘飞鹰[1] 王喜文[1] 黄敏莹[1] 罗丹[1]
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区疾病预防控制中心,南宁530028
出 处:《中国防痨杂志》2009年第3期140-143,共4页Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis
摘 要:目的探索一种适合结核病防治效果综合评价的数理统计方法。方法运用TOPSIS法和RSR分档法相结合对各评价单位的综合评价效果进行排序和分档。结果14个市综合评价排序结果为:好包括南宁、桂林;中包括贵港、崇左、柳州、贺州、玉林、梧州、河池、防城、百色;差包括北海、来宾、钦州。且各组差异具有统计学意义。结论TOPSIS法及RSR分档适合于结核病防治效果的综合评价。Objective To explore a statistical method which is appropriate to evaluate TB control effect comprehensively. Methods Ranked all comprehensive evaluations applying TOPSIS combined with RSR. Results The ranking result of comprehensive evaluations among 14 cities was as follows: Nanning, Guilin were in good group; Guigang, Chongzuo, Liuzhou, Hezhou, Yulin, Wuzhou, Hechi, Fangeheng, Baise were in middle group; Baihai, Laibin, Qingzhou were in poor group. The difference among 3 groups was statistically significant. Conclusions TOPSIS and RSR are suitable for comprehensive evaluation of TB control effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222