检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李平[1] 牟善芳[2] 冯凤[3] 翟燕[4] 谢彩霞[5] 荆淑红[6]
机构地区:[1]山东中医药大学附属医院护理部,山东济南250011 [2]山东中医药大学附属医院妇科,山东济南250011 [3]山东中医药大学附属医院急诊科,山东济南250011 [4]山东中医药大学附属医院骨,山东济南250011 [5]山东中医药大学附属医院免疫内科,山东济南250011 [6]山东中医药大学附属医院肛肠科,山东济南250011
出 处:《护理学杂志》2009年第4期1-3,共3页
基 金:山东省中医药科技发展计划项目(2007-097)
摘 要:目的建立实用的中医医院护理文书书写质量评价指标体系(下称指标体系),为护理文书质量管理提供评价标准和改进依据。方法在回顾文献和典型调查的基础上起草指标体系;运用德尔菲法函询论证,确定指标体系并应用于临床,连续6个月后评价应用指标体系前后护理文书书写质量。结果指标体系包括要素质量(20分)、环节质量(60分)及终末质量(20分)3个维度(共9项一级指标,30项二级指标),每个维度扣分≥10%为不合格。指标体系实施后护理文书书写要素质量、环节质量、终末质量合格率显著高于实施前(均P<0.01)。结论指标体系实用、合理,有利于中医医院护理文书书写质量的提高和持续改进。Objective To construct a scientific, practicable quality evaluation system for nursing documents in TCM hospital, and to provide reference for quality appraisal of nursing document. Methods Literature review, representative survey, and Delphi approach were employed to build the system. After 6 months' clinical application, the quality of nursing documents was compared. Results The quality evaluation system was composed of 3 dimentions, namely essential factor quality (20 points), process quality (60 points) and outcome quality(20 points), with 9 level 1 indicators and 30 level 2 indicators, and more than 10% points deducted from each dimension was considered to be disqualified. The quality of the 3 dimensions of nursing documents showed statistical differences before and after its application (P〈0.01 for all). Conclusion The quality evaluation system for nursing documents in TCM hospital is practicable and reasonable, and it can promote the quality of nursing documents.
关 键 词:中医医院 护理文书 评价指标体系 DELPHI法 护理管理
分 类 号:R248[医药卫生—中医临床基础] C931.3[医药卫生—中医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222