检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]甘肃中医学院附属医院 [2]甘肃省疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《医院院长论坛-首都医科大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第2期40-42,共3页Hospital Directors‘ Forum
摘 要:本文分析了兰州市"双向转诊"问题的客观存在,其原因主要在于医疗卫生资源配置不够合理,政府对社区服务机构的补偿长期不足;各级各类医院转诊积极性有限;许多社区卫生服务站是由卫生诊所转型而来,而其本质并没有发生改变;社区居民对社区卫生服务机构缺乏信任;许多社区卫生服务机构没有纳入医保定点机构,患者在社区报销比较困难;受经济利益的影响,导致上转容易,下转难;双向转诊无具体的、切实可行的标准;双向转诊的相关机制缺失等。This article analyzed the issues of "two-way referral", objectively existing in Lanzhou City. The main reasons include that the distribution of medical and health resources was not reasonable; government compensation to Community Health Services (CHS) is long-term insufficient; referral enthusiasm in all kinds and levels of hospitals is limited; many CHS stations are transformed from health clinics, while the nature has not changed; community residents do not trust CHS; lots of CHS institutions have not be involved into assigned healthcare insurance institutions, so patients have some difficulties in reimbursement in community; it is easy to refer to hospitals but difficult to CHS institutions, due to the economic benefit; "two-way referral" has no specific and practical standards; and the concerning mechanism of "two-way referral" is absent.
分 类 号:F845.65[经济管理—保险] TN943.6[电子电信—信号与信息处理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28