检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳市第二人民医院心血管外科,518035
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志(下旬版)》2009年第4期22-23,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨人工机械瓣置换术后有创动脉血压(ABP)与无创动脉血压(NBP)测量值的差异。方法对40例机械瓣置换术后24h患者进行有创和无创动脉血压监测比较,并对结果进行t检验。结果有创和无创动脉血压在术后早期(12h内)比较差异显著,12h以后比较无显著差异。结论机械瓣置换术后早期的有创血压与实际血压值有一定误差,采用有创血压监测,能更准确的反映血压的真实值,心内直视手术12h以后可以用无创血压监测替代有创血压监测。Objective To investigate the difference between invasive and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring for patients after mechanic valve replacement. Methods Invasive or non- invasive blood pressure of 40 patients after mechanic valve replacement were continuously monitored for 24 hours, and the results underwent t test. Results There was a significant difference between invasive and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring for patients within 12 hours after mechanic valve replacement, but no difference was seen between them after 12 hours. Conclusions It can provide more accurate bases by monitoring blood pressure invasively at early stage after mechanic valve replacement, and it can be replaced by non- invasive blood pressure monitoring 12 hours after mechanic valve replacement.
分 类 号:R541.2[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R544.1[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3