96例浆膜腔积液中的(ATM)结果分析  

96 cases of serous effusions(ATM)results

作　　者：祝丽娟[1] 曹松[1] 周朴华[1] 

机构地区：[1]大庆市人民医院检验科,黑龙江大庆163316

出　　处：《中国医疗前沿（学术版）》2008年第12期88-88,96,共2页China Healthcare Innovation

摘　　要：目的本文对96例浆膜腔积液患者进行ATM(活动性结核标志物)、PCR、PPD检测进行结果分析比较,探讨ATM对结核性浆膜腔积液检测的效果。方法96例浆膜腔积液病例全为我院住院及门诊患者,60例结核性浆膜腔积液根据结核病诊断标准确诊病例。ATM检测应用单向免疫扩散法,PCR用罗氏扩增仪检测。结果ATM与PCR无明显差异,ATM与PPD有明显差异。讨论ATM、PCR、PPD之间有明显差异,ATM检测与PCR无差异但时间短、收费低、稳定性好,在结核性浆膜腔积液诊断上具有较好的意义。Objective In this paper,.96 cases of patients with serous effusions ATM （active tuberculosis marker）, PCR, PPD testing results of the analysis carried out to explore the ATM of serous effusions of tuberculosis testing. Methods in 96 cases of serous effusions aU cases of hospital in-patient and outpatient, 60 cases of tuberculous serous effusions according to confirmed cases of TB diagnostic criteria. ATM application SRID detection method, PCR amplification detected by Roche. Results ATM and PCR there was no significant difference, ATM and there are significant differences in PPD. Conclusion ATM, PCR, PPD significant difference between, ATM and PCR testing, but no difference in a short time, low fares, good stability, and tuberculosis in serous effusions have a better diagnosis.

关 键 词：ATM PCR 结核性浆膜腔积液 

分 类 号：R561[医药卫生—呼吸系统] R542.12[医药卫生—内科学]