PI-WSUR量表在中国大学生人群中的修订  

Validity and Reliability of Chinese Version of Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision for College Students

作　　者：庞礴[1] 朱春燕[1] 汪凯[1,2] 张蕾[1] 杨平[1] 马季[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽医科大学医学心理学系,安徽合肥230032 [2]安徽医科大学第一附属医院神经内科,安徽合肥230032

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2009年第2期131-133,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(030670706);安徽省教育厅自然科学基金(KJ2008B305);安徽医科大学校级科研基金(2007kj27)

摘　　要：目的:本研究旨在将帕多瓦量表-华盛顿州立大学修订版(Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision,PI-WSUR)引进中国,考察PI-WSUR在中国非临床样本中的效度和信度。方法:随机抽取673名大学生完成各项量表,并对其中的153名大学生进行了重测。结果:效度检验:检验结构效度获得个5因素,与原量表一致,各因素都具有良好的区分效度(P<0.05;P<0.001)和校标效度(P<0.01);信度检验:PI-WSUR总分的α系数为0.90,各因素α系数分别为0.77,0.80,0.87,0.80,0.74,重测信度分别为0.59,0.53,0.61,0.74,0.60。本研究在PI-WSUR总分上未发现性别差异,但是女性被试在"污染/清洗强迫"的得分显著高于男性(P<0.000);男性被试在"伤害他人/自己的强迫冲动"的得分显著高于女性(P<0.01)。结论:PI-WSUR具备合格的效度和信度。Objective： To examine the validity and reliability of the Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revi- sion（PI-WSUR） used in Chinese college students. Methods： The translated version of the PI-WSUR, was used in 673 college students to examine its reliability and factorial structure by principal component analysis,internal consistency and test-retest. 153 college students were administered the PI-WSUR twice for test-retest study to further investigate its differentiation validity and its relationship with the obsessive-compulsive subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised （SCL-90-R OC）. Results： Five factors were extracted from the Inventory and all of them had significant differentiation validity （P〈0.05;P〈0.O01） and correlations with SCL-90-R-OC （P〈0.01）. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were 0.90 and 0.67. Factor 1（P〈0.000） and Factor 5（P〈0.001） were significantly different between men and women. Conclusion： The result of the study shows good validity for the PI-WSUR, and confirmed its internal consistency and testretest reliability reported by previous studies.

关 键 词：强迫症状 Padua量表-华盛顿州立大学修订版 效度 信度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]