检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高妍[1] 冯晋光[1] 李长红[1] 冯琦[1] 郑家玑 高燕明[1] 施曼珠[1] 陈澜[1] 惠岩[1]
机构地区:[1]北京医科大学第一医院内分泌科
出 处:《中华内分泌代谢杂志》1998年第1期8-10,共3页Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
摘 要:目的比较拜糖平和美迪康对2型糖尿病的临床疗效。方法将单纯饮食控制或加用磺脲类药物治疗不满意的2型糖尿病人80例,随机分为拜糖平组48例和美迪康组32例,疗程为16周。结果与结论美迪康对降空腹血糖的疗效率高于拜糖平(有效率分别为96.9%:85.7%,显效率为71.9%:47.6%;P均<0.01),而拜糖平对降餐后2小时血糖的疗效高于美迪康(有效率分别为97.6%:93.8%,显效率为71.4%:65.6%;P<0.01);两药均能明显降低GHbA1c,拜糖平组从9.19%±2.78%降至6.76%±1.33%(P<0.01),美迪康组从9.23%±1.89%降至7.15%±1.24%(P<0.01),两药相比对降低GHbA1c的幅度无统计学意义(P>0.50)。两种药物不刺激胰岛素的分泌。Objective Comparing the clinical effect between the acarbose and metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods Eighty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, who were poorly controlled on diet only or plus sulfonylureas treatment, were randomized into two groups and treated for 16 weeks with either acarbose 50~100mg tid (n=48) or metformin 250~500mg tid (n=32) separately. Results and Conclusion The results showed that both acarbose and metformin led to a reduction of GHbA 1c, the mean fasting and 2h postprandial blood glucose levels. The efficacy rate of reduction of the mean fasting blood glucose level with metformin was higher than that of acarbose (96.9% vs 85.7%; P<0.01), and the efficacy rate of reduction of the 2h postprandial blood glucose levels with acarbose was higher than that of metformin (97.6% vs 93.8%; P<0.01). The levels of GHbA 1c were reduced in both groups (P<0.01) but without statistically significant difference (P>0.50). The two drugs had no insulinotropic effect and did not affect the plasma lipid and the functions of liver and kidney.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28