环境风险评价与安全评价危险源辨识的异同  

Differences and Sameness of Dangerous Source Recognition between ERA and SA

作　　者：石砚秀[1] 李琴[1] 潘旸[1] 翟建平[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学环境学院污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室,南京210093

出　　处：《环境保护科学》2009年第2期94-97,共4页Environmental Protection Science

摘　　要：环境风险评价(ERA)和安全评价(SA)的目标较易混淆,而危险源辨识是这两类评价所要解决的首要问题,对其深入分析有助于比较两类评价的内涵和侧重点的差异。本文依据危险源理论,分析了这两类评价的危险源分类、事故致因机理模型以及危险源与两类评价的关联,并从危险源辨识的目的、内容、程序、方法等方面对比了ERA与SA各自的特点,提出了进一步完善环境风险评价的思路和方法。The target of ERA and SA are easily to be confused, and dangerous source recognition is the first issue to be resolved, deeply analyzing is helpful to compare the differences of the connotation and emphases of the two assessment. Based on the theory of dangerous source, the paper analyzed the classification of the dangerous source of two kinds of assessment, the accident causation mechanism model and the relationship between dangerous source and two kinds of assessment, than compared the characteristic of ERA and SA on several aspects, including purpose, content, procedure and methods of dangerous source recognition. In the end, some further methods to perfect the ERA were put forward.

关 键 词：环境风险评价 安全评价 危险源 危险源辨识 

分 类 号：X820.4[环境科学与工程—环境工程] X9-65