检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾曼云[1]
出 处:《现代临床护理》2009年第4期25-26,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的对常规肌内注射法和Z-路径肌内注射法进行比较,为临床肌内注射法提供一种更佳的注射方法。方法2007年8~9月对需要肌内注射给药的120例门诊患者,采用自身对照法,在每例患者两侧臀大肌注射给药时,分别使用常规肌内注射法和Z-路径肌内注射法,分别观察并记录注射后药(血)液外渗和疼痛不良反应发生情况。结果Z-路径肌内注射法较常规肌内注射法药液外溢、疼痛发生率低,两组比较,均P<0.001,差异具有统计学意义。结论Z-路径肌内注射法所致药液外溢以及局部不适反应的发生率低,有助于药物的吸收和利用,减轻患者的疼痛,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare the effects of Z-track intramuscular injection and routine intramuscular injection for the purpose of providing a preferable injection technique in clinical nursing practice. Methods 120 outpatients undergoing intramuscular injection were recruited. The methods of single blindness and self-control were used, and both sides of gluteus muscles received routine and Z-track intramuscular injection at the first time. Injection-related extravasation, and pain were observed and recorded. Result Extravasation and pains from Z-track maneuver were less frequent than those from routine injection technique, with difference statistically between the two groups. Conclusions Z-track intramuscular injection is superior to the routine intramuscular injection for less extravasation and few pains. Z-track intramuscular injection may be applied widely in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28