检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海军工程大学电子工程学院,武汉430033 [2]海军702厂,上海200434
出 处:《系统仿真学报》2009年第9期2554-2556,2561,共4页Journal of System Simulation
摘 要:水声对抗与反对抗的结果直接影响着海战中敌对双方所处的态势,应用双基地声纳系统进行水声反对抗较传统的单基地声纳具有一定的优势。在双基地抗干扰方程的基础上,分析了目标使用噪声干扰器进行水声对抗时,对双基地声纳接收基地的干扰程度。以舰、机联合双基地为例,计算接收基地处于敌潜艇不同方位上时,噪声干扰器对其的最小干扰距离,绘出有效阵位选择区,并将其与吊放声纳被动搜索时的情况进行比较,直观给出了舰、机联合双基地反对抗应用效果优于吊放单基被动反对抗的结论。The status of both sides of hostile in a naval battle is affected by the result of acoustic warfare (AW) and anti-jamming. It is more preferable for bistatic-sonar to put up anti-jamming than monostatic sonar. On the base of AW anti-jamming equation, the capability of anti-jamming to the receiver was analyzed when the other using acoustic jammer. The minimum jamming-range was calculated when receive being in any azimuth of the target in the example of ship-helicopter coordination. Further more, the effective coverage for receiver was figured and compared to monostatic system using passive dipping sonar. Advantage of bistatic-sonar system in anti-jamming is showed intuitively.
关 键 词:水声对抗 反对抗 双基地声纳 舰机联合 有效阵位选择区
分 类 号:TB566[交通运输工程—水声工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117