检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]兰州大学法学院,甘肃兰州730000 [2]中山大学法学院,广东广州510275
出 处:《中山大学研究生学刊(社会科学版)》2009年第1期62-68,共7页Journal of the Graduates Sun YAT-SEN University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:关于中国古代是否存在行政法,学术界一直有较大争议。这些争议并没有基于一个共同的前提而展开,因此寻找一个正确的前提作为出发点是关键。本文从词源和历史的角度对该问题进行考证。认为我国古代存在着众多的行政法律规范,特别是以唐代的行政法律制度为代表的中国古代行政法内容庞博、门类齐全、规范细密,并且极具中国特色。承认、研究、借鉴它们对当前进行社会主义行政法治建设具有重要的现实意义。The issue whether the administrative law had existed in ancient China have been argued for long time. It is a key point to search a fight premise before the study of the issue, but the arguments are not having the same premise. This paper studies the issue from the aspect of derivation and history. The conclusion is that there were lots of administrative laws in ancient China, especially in Tang dynasty. The laws in Tang were not only comprehensive in contents and providing with details but various, and it represented the character of ancient Chinese administrative law. As a use of reference, the ancient administrative law is important and valuable for today's construction of socialistic administrative law.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D630.1[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28