管制刑司法适用的几个问题  

On the Problems of the Control of Criminal Justice Applied

作　　者：孟庆华[1] 牛海洋[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北大学政法学院,河北保定071002

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2009年第2期35-38,共4页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘　　要：管制刑适用比例低的原因除了主观因素外,还有客观方面的因素,即管制刑不是随意适用的,只有在符合管制刑的条件下才能加以适用。完全否认刑法第39条对管制刑犯的限制性作用是不可取的,并非是刑法第39条规定不具有限制性,而是由于执行不力使刑法第39条规定的限制性作用得不到执行。"社区服务令"是某些国家规定的一种刑罚方式,但在我国刑法中却缺少法律依据,因而管制刑不能由"社区刑罚"取代。Control the application of punishment in addition to the reasons for the low proportion of subjective factors, there are objective factors that control the application of arbitrary punishment is not only subject to control under the conditions of the sentence can be applied to. Completely denied that Article 39 of the Penal Code in order to control the restrictive role of the criminal offense is not desirable, not criminal law provisions of Article 39 of the non - restrictive, but due to poor implementation of the Criminal Code to make 39 of the restrictive provisions of the role of the lack of implementation of. ＂Community Service Order＂ in some countries is provided for a penalty, but in our criminal law is the lack of legal basis and therefore can not be controlled by the sentence ＂community penalty＂.

关 键 词：管制刑 罪犯 限制性规定 社区服务令 

分 类 号：D926.7[政治法律—法学] D921