检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川成都610054 [2]西南科技大学经济管理学院,四川绵阳621010
出 处:《中国管理科学》2009年第2期52-58,共7页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金(70702025);教育部科学技术研究重点项目(105149);教育部博士点基金资助项目(20060614023)
摘 要:从企业社会责任的一个方面——产品的安全性能对消费者偏好的影响入手,运用博弈论的基本思想,对消费者驱动的制销供应链安全责任决策进行了研究。结果表明:g类制销联盟较好地履行安全责任,能提高消费者对g类产品的支付意愿,从而获得较高的利润,这将对g类制销联盟进一步较好地履行安全责任产生激励驱动;若g类制销联盟未能较好地履行安全责任,消费者会用抵制购买(这种抵制行为会造成g类制销联盟的利润损失)的惩罚方式来驱动其较好地履行安全责任。g类制销联盟的最优决策是在控制成本的基础上较好地履行安全责任。本文的研究成果对供应链各成员的决策均有重要的指导意义。Starting from one perspective of the corporate social responsibilities-the product safety and its influence on the consumers,applying the basic idea of game theory,the essay studies consumer-driving decision for safety responsibility of manufacturer-retailer supply chain.The results show that it can heighten consumer's pay desire to g product that g manufacturer-retailer alliance fulfills safety responsibilities better,thereby achieves higher profit.The situation will incentive g manufacturer-retailer alliance to fulfill safety responsibilities better further.Consumer will drive g manufacturer-retailer alliance to fulfill safety responsibilities better with punishing ways if g manufacturer-retailer alliance fulfills safety responsibilities badly,the punishing ways come from consumer's boycott,which will make g manufacturer-retailer alliance a loss of profits.The perfect decision of g manufacturer-retailer alliance is fulfilling safety responsibilities better on the basis of controlling cost.The study will provide avaluable guidance to the decision of supply chain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28