检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《交通运输系统工程与信息》2009年第2期122-128,共7页Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基 金:铁道部基金项目(2007X001-D)
摘 要:旅客出行偏好选择问题是旅客出行行为分析理论的一个重要部分,而旅客对出行方案的选择是基于对各种方案的评价指标的综合分析.但旅客对各评价指标的侧重程度,即属性权重的计算,目前常用方法都有一定的局限性.本文以旅客出行偏好选择为背景,借助多指标评价方法TOPSIS的评价准则,以实际的大规模旅客调查数据为基础,分析、确定旅客对出行方案各属性指标的权重,为旅客出行行为分析提供重要、客观、可靠的依据.经过实例验证,证明了该方法的有效性,并将计算结果代入多项Logit模型,进一步验证了计算结果的合理性.此外,该方法计算简便、易于实现,对于各种交通方式下的旅客出行偏好选择问题具有普遍适用性.Travel preference of passenger plays an important role in passenger's travel behaviour analytical theory. Passenger' s choice of travel modes is based on the comprehensive analysis of evaluating indexes of each plan. However, the commonly-used methods of determining the attribute weights, which denote the passenger's preference for evaluating indexes, have their limitations. Based on the preference of passenger's travel and choice behaviour, this paper analyzes and determines the weights of evaluating indexes, which was ruled by the appraisal criterion of multiple attribute decision making method TOPSIS and deduced with the large-scale original data from passenger's questionnaires. The weight determining method provides important, objective, and reliable data for passenger's travel choice behaviour analysis. The effectiveness of the method has been verified by an example. And the rationality of the result has been testified by the Muhinomial Logit Model. Furthermore, the presented method is easy to calculate, convenient to implement and univer-sally applicable in passenger's preference choice problem under every tragic modes.
分 类 号:U293[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235