检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳云龙[1,2] 施振香[1] 尹骏[1] 林文鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学地理系,上海200234 [2]上海师范大学城市生态与环境研究中心,上海200234
出 处:《水土保持学报》2009年第2期232-235,共4页Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目(J50402);上海师范大学校级项目(SK200729)
摘 要:对低丘红壤地区红壤性水稻土(黄筋泥田)和旱地红壤(黄筋泥)及不同利用方式下土壤的持水和供水特征进行了研究。结果表明,与红壤性水稻土相比,旱地红壤持水供水能力弱;红壤性水稻土各样品之间持水和释水能力的差异与有机质的变化相似,在红壤地区,培肥土壤有利于提高土壤抗旱能力,土壤利用方式不同改变了土壤孔隙的分布状况,使旱地红壤在低吸力段土壤的水分特征存在明显差异。This research was carried out on quaternary hilly red clay soil. Soil water-holding capacity and soil water release characters were analyzed. The results showed that the soil water holding and supplying capacity of upland soil was lower than the paddy soil. The variation of soil water holding and supplying capacity among paddy soil samples was similar to the variation of soil organic matter, it would improve soil drought resistance ability to fertilise the red clay soil. Soil water characters with different soil utilizations varied obviously in low soil suction, and different soil utilizations changed the distribution of soil pore.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4