乳腺癌术后不同引流方法使用效果对比研究  

Contrast study on the efficacy of different drainage methods after the operation for breast cancer

作　　者：王厚玲 

机构地区：[1]枣庄市峄城区人民医院,山东枣庄277300

出　　处：《齐鲁护理杂志（下半月刊）（外科护理）》2009年第3期1-2,共2页Journal of Qilu Nursing

基　　金：枣庄市科技局立项课题(200806320391)

摘　　要：目的:比较乳腺癌患者术后不同引流方法的使用效果。方法:将112例乳腺癌手术患者随机分为两组,实验组56例采用一次性负压引流器进行腋窝、胸骨旁双负压引流,同时采用"一对一"心理干预模式;对照组56例采用一次性引流袋进行腋窝、胸骨旁双正压引流,同时实施传统常规心理干预。结果:两组患者的置管时间、平均住院时间、住院费用及并发症发生情况比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论:对乳腺癌术后患者采用一次性负压引流器进行双负压引流和"一对一"心理干预,可缩短置管时间和平均住院时间,降低住院费用,减少并发症的发生,值得临床推广应用。Objective： To compare the effeet of different drainage methods after the operation for breast cancer. Methods： 112 patients with breast cancer surgery were randomly divided into experimental group （n = 56） and control group （n = 56）. In experimental group, disposable negative pressure deviee was used for dual negative pressure drainage for the patients in armpit and sternum and at the same time the ＂one - on - one＂ model of psychological intervention was applied to the patients. In control group, disposable drainage bag was used to carry out dual positive drainage for the patients in armpit and sternum, and the eon- ventional psyehologieal intervention was taken simultaneously. Results： There were significant differences in the comparison of indwelling time, average length of hospitalization, costs and the incidence of complications between the two groups （ P 〈 0. 05, P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conelusion： Using dual negative pressure drainage by disposable negative pressure device and taking psyehological intervention can shorten the indwelling time and average length of hospitalization and reduce costs and incidence of complieations after breast cancer surgery. The technique is recommended to be used in clinical practice.

关 键 词：乳腺癌 引流 皮瓣 

分 类 号：R473.71[医药卫生—护理学]