检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈菁
出 处:《井冈山医专学报》2009年第1期70-71,共2页Journal of Jinggangshan Medical College
摘 要:目的为了减轻病人的痛苦,进一步提高护理质量,研究、改良静脉穿刺后拔针法。方法选择2008年5~6月在医院门诊治疗室输液治疗病人200例,随机分为常规组和改良组,每组100例。常规组以传统方法实施静脉穿刺后拔针操作,改良组以改良方法实施静脉穿刺后拔针操作,观察、统计病人的疼痛反应、血管周围瘀血和针眼出血情况。结果两组病人针眼出血情况经比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),疼痛反应和血管周围瘀血现象常规组与改良组比较有高度显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论静脉穿刺后改良拔针法有临床应用价值,可推广使用。Objective: To evaluate the effect of modified needle withdrawal after venipuncture. Methods: Between, 200 patients with transfusion in the outpatient department from May 2008 to June 2008 in our hospital were randomly divided into the routine group and the modified group, each with 100 eases. The routine group was performed conventional needle withdrawal and the modified group with modified needle withdrawal. The pain reaction, perivascular haemostasis and hemorrhage of puncture hole were observed. Results: The hemorrhage of puncture hole was no statistic significance between the two groups (P 〉 0.05), and the pain response and perivascular haemostasis were significant different between the two groups (P 〈0.01). Conclusion: The modified needle withdrawal was a valuable technique which should be extended to clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15