检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沙莉娜[1] 凡星[1] 杨瑞武[2] 王晓丽[2] 周永红[1]
机构地区:[1]四川农业大学小麦研究所,四川温江611130 [2]四川农业大学生命科学与理学院,四川雅安625014
出 处:《四川农业大学学报》2009年第1期6-13,共8页Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30470135;30870154)
摘 要:基于21个形态性状,对34个赖草属类群进行了表型分支分析。经简约分析,得到了70颗同等最大简约分支树,其严格一致树显示:①赖草属在形态上为高水平的分化,在组间及种间均存在着广泛的变异,不支持现有的赖草属分组;②北美的赖草属植物与欧亚大陆赖草属植物亲缘关系较远;③L.duthiei、L.duthieivar.longearistatus和L.coreanus与其他赖草植物的亲缘关系较近,支持将其从猬草组合到赖草属中。鉴于性状状态间存在着较多的平行和逆转进化,同时性状状态间的演化可能平行的、多次的或者是特化的,这样复杂的演化关系很难通过简约化的分支分析来重建,结合细胞学和DNA序列分析很可能是必需的。Based on 21 morphological characters, a cladistic analysis of 34 Leymus species was conducted. The parsimony analysis yielded 70 equally most parsimonious trees and a strict consensus tree. The results indicated that: (1) Leymus species have rich variation in in these morphological characteristics, which is not agreement with the subdivison of Leymus; (2) the Leymus species in North America differed morphologically from the Eurasian Leymus species; (3) L. duthiei, L. duthiei var. longearistatus, and L. coreanus are closely related to other Leymus species, and it is reasonable to transfer these taxa from Hystrix to Leyrnus. In addition, the high level distribution of homoplastic characters in Leymus, together with the parallel or multiple evolution, makes it difficult to reconstruct phylogenetic tree by parsimony analysis very difficult. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the morphological data with DNA sequence data to reconstruct phylogeny of Leymus.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43