权威命题与来源命题——排他性法律实证主义的一种论证理路  

Authoritative Thesis and Sources Thesis:An Argument Approach of Exclusive Legal Positivism

作　　者：朱振[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学理论法学研究中心,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2009年第3期153-160,共8页Law and Social Development

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"法律的权威性:基于实践哲学的研究"(08CFX003)

摘　　要：来源命题(the sources thesis)指的是法律的存在及内容完全是一个社会事实问题,拉兹用来自权威的论据(即法律必然主张合法性权威)来论证这一命题。同时拉兹也以权威论据批判德沃金的融贯命题和Coleman的道德安置命题(moral incorporation thesis),并最终表明,来源命题是唯一与权威论相符合的理论主张。The sources thesis means that the existence and content of law is fully a social determined, the argument of which is employed from authority by Raz, i. e. , Law must relies on legitimate authority. Meanwhile, Raz made critics on Dworkin＇ s coherence thesis and Coleman＇ s moral incorporation thesis, and proved that the sources thesis is the unique theoretical claim in line with the theory of authority.

关 键 词：融贯 权威 来源命题 排他性法律 实证主义 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]