论财产权过度限制的损失补偿制度——以“禁摩令”案为例  

On the Issues about Loss Compensation of Liminting Property Excessively——Thought about the "rule of prohibiting motor"

作　　者：董彪[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京工商大学法学院,北京100048

出　　处：《当代法学》2009年第3期67-72,共6页Contemporary Law Review

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"和谐社会建设中的利益冲突及其法律调整研究"(05&ZD025)

摘　　要：财产的价值在于利用。对财产权进行限制,以至财产权人无法利用其财产时,虽无征收之名,却有征收之实。在这种情形下,由于财产权并未被剥夺,财产权人不享有征收补偿请求权。此外,由于限制财产权的行为具有合法性,财产权人无法请求国家赔偿。如何保护财产权人,提供必要的救济手段,不无疑问。以"禁摩令"反映的社会问题为切入点,深入研究财产权限制及补偿问题,有助于完善损失补偿体系并保障财产权人的利益。The value of property exists in the use. The property is useless for people, If the property is limited to be unavailable. It is not named condemnation, but it is like condemnation in nature. In this situation, the property is not be desposed, so there is no right to ask for loss compensation because of condemnation. And the people has no right to ask for state compensation because the public power is legal. How to protect the people？ It is necessary to do some research on the property limited and loss compensation in the respect which happened in the isssues of ＂rule of prohibiting motor＂.

关 键 词：财产权 禁摩令 过度限制 合理限制 征收 

分 类 号：D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]