Ⅱ和Ⅲ期直肠癌术后卡培他滨±奥沙利铂同步放化疗急性副反应比较  被引量:10

Comparison of acute toxicities between two postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens of capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin in patients with stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ rectal cancer

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:金晶[1] 李晔雄[1] 王维虎[1] 王凯[1] 宋永文[1] 王淑莲[1] 张世平[1] 刘跃平[1] 房辉[1] 曲媛[1] 刘新帆[1] 余子豪[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院放疗科,北京100021

出  处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2009年第3期200-204,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology

基  金:卫生部吴阶平医学基金项目(WKJ2005-3-006);北京希望马拉松专项基金资助(LC2007A17)

摘  要:目的比较两个前瞻性非随机对照直肠癌术后同步放化疗临床Ⅱ期研究的急性毒副反应及耐受性。方法2005年3月至2007年11月分别进行卡培他滨术后同步放化疗(单药组,n=118)和奥沙利铂+卡培他滨术后同步放化疗(双药组,n=90)的Ⅱ期临床研究。两组均予真骨盆放疗DT50Gy分25次5周完成,化疗药物予以连用2周停1周,放疗中共用2周期的方法。单药组卡培他滨每天2次1600mg/m^2;双药组奥沙利铂每周1次70mg/m^2,卡培他滨每天2次1300mg/m^2。结果双药组患者中断放疗(10.2%:6.7%,χ^2=0.80,P=0.460)或化疗的比率(9.3%:19.1%,χ^2=4.80,P=0.090)与单药组相似。双药组1~4级急性非血液学毒副反应发生率显著高于单药组,主要为恶心(χ^2=46.90,P=0.000),腹泻(χ^2=13.50,P=0.009),乏力(χ^2=18.90,P=0.000),手足综合症(χ^2=7.10,P=0.029)和食欲下降(χ^2=19.90,P=0.000)。全组发生3、4级以上严重副反应包括腹泻(24.0%、1.0%)、白细胞下降(4.3%、0.0%)、放射性皮炎(3.8%、0.O%)、腹痛(1.0%、0.0%)和乏力(0.5%、0.0%),但只有3、4级腹泻发生率双药组显著高于单药组(33.0%:18.6%,χ^2=5.90,P=0.023)。结论接受奥沙利铂+卡培他滨双药同步放化疗患者3、4级腹泻发生率显著高于卡培他滨单药同步放化疗,但其他严重副反应发生率低且两组相似。Objective To compare the acute toxicities between two prospective, non-randomize phase Ⅱ trials on adjuvant radiochemotherapy of capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin in patients with stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ rectal cancer. Methods From March 2005 to November 2007,based on two fulfilled phase I studies, two phase Ⅱ trials were launched respectively to further observe the tolerance and toxicity. In one trial,118 patients were treated with concurrent eapeeitabine and radiotherapy( Cap-CRT trial), with radiotherapy of DT50 Gy/25 F/5 wks to the pelvis,and eapeeitabine at a dose of 1600 mg/m^2/d(dl -d14,3 weeks per cycle). In the other trial ,90 patients received concurrent oxaliplatin, capecitabine and radiotherapy( Cap-Oxa-CRT trial) ,with the same radiotherapy schedule ,while oxaliplatin at a dose of 70 mg/m^2 ( d1, d8) and eapecitabine of 1300 mg/m^2/d( dl -d14,3 weeks per cycle). Results There was no significant difference in the delay of radiotherapy( 10.2% vs 6.7% ,χ^2 =0.80 ,P =0.460) or chemotherapy(9.3% vs 19.1% ,χ^2 =4.80,P =0. 090) between Cap-CRT and Cap-Oxa-CRT trials. Grade 1 - 4 leukopenia, diarrhea and nausea were the most common acute side-effects in the both trials, accounting for 70.2% ,65.9% and 42.3% ,respectively. When comparing with Cap-CRT trial, Cap-Oxa-CRT trial had significantly more grade 1 -4 non-hemotologieal toxicities,mainly in GI,including nausea(68.9% vs 22.0% ,χ^2=46.90 ,P = 0. 000) ,diarrhea(76.7% vs 57.6% ,χ^2 = 13.50,P =0.009) ,fatigue (47.8% vs 13.7% ,χ^2 = 18.90 ,P=0. 000) , hand-foot syndrome ( 14.4% vs 4.2% , χ^2 = 7.10, P = 0.029 ), and inappetence ( 50.0% vs. 27.9% , χ^2= 25.70, P = 0. 000 ), but not in hematological toxities of leukopenia, anemia or thrombocytopenia. Of all the patients, grade 3 and grade 4 toxicities were diarrhea(24.0% and 1.0% ), leukopenia(4.3% and 0.0% ) ,radiation-induced dermatitis(3.8% and 0.0% ) ,cramping abdominal pain( 1.0% and 0.0% ) and fatigue(0.5% and 0.0% ). Only gra

关 键 词:直肠肿瘤/放化疗法 放化疗法 同步 奥沙利铂 卡培他滨 临床Ⅱ期研究 

分 类 号:R686[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象