2种吸痰器接管保存方法的比较研究  

Comparative study in two preservation methods of the sputum aspirator nozzle

作　　者：李容华[1] 张贵清[1] 秦川[1] 林道英 

机构地区：[1]四川省达州市第二人民医院,635000

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志（中旬版）》2009年第5期79-80,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

摘　　要：目的探讨一种简便安全的吸痰器接管保存方法。方法采用自身对照的方法。传统方法将接管置于装消毒液的玻璃瓶内；改良法将1根无菌吸痰管固定在吸引器或床头的适当位置，接头端游离，吸痰完毕后将玻璃接管接在该吸痰管的游离接头上。同一个患者用同一个吸痰器，2种接管保存方法每24h交替进行。比较2种方法的接管滑脱污染次数，分别在玻璃接管、消毒液瓶／吸痰管接头上取样做细菌培养并做比较。结果2种方法接管滑脱污染次数，玻璃接管、消毒液瓶、吸痰管接头菌落阳性率比较差异有显著性。结论用吸痰管固定和保护吸痰器接管，优于传统的将接管置于装消毒液的玻璃瓶内，此方法简便安全，取材方便，经济实用，值得临床推广。Objective To explore a simple and safe method for preservation of the sputum aspirator nozzle. Methods Using self-controlled method, the traditional method was to place the nozzle in the glass bottle of disinfectant liquid, the modified method was to fix a sputum tube to a suitable location of the sputum aspirator or bedside with the joint free, after sputum aspiration,the nozzle was connected to the joint. One patient used the same sputum aspirator. The two methods of preservation were alternated every 24 hours. The slippage times of the nozzle were compared, and samples from glass nozzle and joints of disinfectant hquid bottles/spu- tum tube joints were underwent bacterial culture. Results Significant difference existed in slippage times of the nozzle, the positive rate of bacteria colony in the glass nozzle and disinfectant liquid bottles/sputum tube joints between the two methods. Conclusions Using sputum aspiration tubes to fix the nozzle of aputum aspirator is better than the traditional method of putting the nozzle into the glass bottle of disinfectant liquid,this method proves to be easy, safe,portable and economical and is worthy of clinical application.

关 键 词：吸痰器 接管 保存 

分 类 号：R472.9[医药卫生—护理学] R457.1[医药卫生—临床医学]