检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾佳[1]
出 处:《安阳师范学院学报》2009年第1期43-46,共4页Journal of Anyang Normal University
摘 要:刑法的立法和司法活动都离不开刑法的解释。目前,刑法解释主体的多样化带来了诸多矛盾:刑法的立法解释和司法解释存在失谐,司法解释内部存在冲突。本文在考察我国刑法解释权的现状,对其存在问题进行分析的基础上,对我国刑法解释权进行尝试性的重构,以期促进刑法立法解释和司法解释的协调,实现刑法解释权的合理配置有所助益。Legislative and judicial activities of criminal law are dependent on the interpretation of criminal law. The multiplication of the subject of interpretation of criminal law has caused many conflicts under such condition as inharmonious relation between legislative and judicial interpretation of criminal law and the conflictions within judicial interpretation. Based on the study and analysis of the interpretation power of criminal law in China, this paper intends to reconstruct a new interpretation power of criminal law in order,to harmonize legislative and judicial interpretation of criminal law and to optimize the arrangement of interpretation power of the criminal law in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249