检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:元锦花[1] 李新宇[1] 张妍[1] 李虹雯[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院消毒供应中心,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2009年第9期1103-1104,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的比较医院手术器械清洗效果目检法与血红蛋白酶法检测结果。方法分别对5个批次的清洗后的手术器械进行目测法和血红蛋白酶法检测。结果在所有检测的230个样品中,目测法检测所有样品均清洗合格,使用血红蛋白酶法检测,所有样品表面血红蛋白残留量均<5μg,其中76.0%的样品为≤0.1μg。结论与目检法相比,使用血红蛋白酶法可以检测出目测法不能观察到的污染物残留,能够更好地进行清洗效果评价。OBJECTIVE To compare the difference of testing cleaning effectiveness in the operation instrument between the eye measurement and hemoglobin enzyme test. METHODS Five batches of instrument after cleaning were tested by two methods. RESULTS By eye inspection, all tested samples were qualified. However there were only 76 percent of samples qualified according to enzyme test. CONCLUSIONS Compared with eye inspection, enzyme test is a more sensitive method. Enzyme test can better assess the cleaning effectiveness than others.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30