一组汉语普通话单音节表在听力损失人群中的复测信度研究  

Test-retest Reliability Study in Hearing Loss Group of 18 Mandarin Monosyllable Lists with Equivalency in Audibility

作　　者：陈艾婷[1] 冀飞[1] 郗昕[1] 韩东一[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军总医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科、解放军耳鼻咽喉科研究所,北京100853

出　　处：《听力学及言语疾病杂志》2009年第3期201-204,共4页Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology

基　　金：科技部十一五支撑计划项目(2007BAI18B12)资助

摘　　要：目的评价一组经过等价性验证的汉语普通话单音节表在听力损失患者中的复测信度。方法使用一组等价的单音节表对18名有听力损失的受试者进行识别率测试,测试强度在纯音平均听阈上30dB,每位受试者以不同表号起始顺序测完所有表,并在间隔1到16天后以相同表序再次进行测试,对两轮结果进行统计学分析。结果两轮测试得分的相关系数为0.931,对两轮测试的识别率得分进行"合理化"反正弦变换后,计算两轮得分差值的标准差,获得该组表在95%置信度下的临界差值为16.3%。结论这组普通话单音节表在评价治疗或助听前后的效果时,只有识别率差值超过16.3%,才能得出"处置有效"的结论。Objective To evaluate Test--retest reliability of Mandarin monosyllable lists with equivalency m audibility in hearing loss group. Methods Mandarin monosyllable lists were used to test 18 adults with moderate-- to--severe sensorineural hearing loss. Each people was tested twice with an interval of several days and with same test conditions including same lists order, same presentation level, and same tester. List number to begin with was different between people. All test lists for one patient were presented by 30 dB above his hearing threshold levels. Recognition scores were recorded in both tests. The results were analyzed using SPSS. Results Pearson product-- moment correlation between the scores of two tests was 0. 931 （P〈0. 001）. The average critical difference was 16.3G at the 950//00 confidence level after the scores transformed into ＂rationalized＂ arcsine unit （RAU）. Conclusion The average critical difference is 16. 3% at the 95% confidence level which is less than in the normal hearing group. All the lists have good test--retest reliability, and can be used in extensive clinical practice.

关 键 词：复测信度 相关系数 临界差值 

分 类 号：H018.4[语言文字—语言学]