检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州医学院附属沙井医院神经外科,深圳518104
出 处:《中国临床护理》2009年第3期180-182,共3页Chinese Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的通过对密闭式留置针两种不同置管方法比较,以探讨更适合危重症患者导管留置的方法。方法将80例需长期进行静脉输液的危重症患者随机分为对照组和观察组各40例。对照组采用常规方法,观察组采用改进的方法(即退针芯送软管,再退针芯送软管,依次将软管送入血管中的方法),比较两组一次置管的成功率。结果在血管粗、直、走向较长的情况下,对照组和观察组一次置管成功率分别为96.66%和100%,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);在血管较细、弯曲、走向较短的情况下,对照组和观察组一次置管成功率分别为70%和95.24%,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论改进法可提高危重症患者的一次置管成功率,尤其在血管细、弯曲、走向较短情况下效果更明显。Objective To explore a more suitable close venous indwelling methods for critically ill patients. Methods Eighty critically ill patients undergoing long-term intravenous infusion were randomly divided into control group and observation group (n=40 in each group). The observation group was treated by conventional method, while the control group was treated by the improved method. The success rate at one attempt was compared between the two groups. Results On long, and wide straight blood vessels, the success rate in the control and observation groups was 96.66% and 100% respectively, with the difference being significant between two groups (P〈0.05). On short, and narrow curved blood vessels, the success rate in the control and observation groups was 70% and 95.24% respectively, with the difference being obviously significant (P〈0.001). Conclusion The improved method can increase the success rate of close venous indwelling needles in the critically ill patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222