检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董志贵[1]
机构地区:[1]会宁县委党校,甘肃会宁730700
出 处:《兰州交通大学学报》2009年第2期129-133,共5页Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University
摘 要:因"三大差距"进一步扩大,并引发诸多社会矛盾、危及社会和谐,公平与效率的关系问题再度成为学术界争论的焦点。本文认为当前学术界相异的观点实质上具有统一性,而引发争议的主要原因有二:一是对公平内涵理解的差异,二是没有"具体问题、具体分析"。并就以上两个问题提出了相应的观点及现阶段恰当处理公平与效率关系的政策主张。Because the "three big spatial differences" enlargement goes further, and causes a lot of society contradictions,so that endangers society harmony, thus relations between fairness and efficiency become the focus of the academic circles disputes again. This passage holds that different standpoints of current academic circles in fact have unity, thus there are two main reasons cause disputes: one is understanding diversity of fairness, the other is the profound rank order of income distribution spatial difference enlargement which caused by not "specific question, specific analysis". And according to the two questions, we raise corresponding standpoints and policy view of dealing with relations properly between fairness and efficiency at current stage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.39