《广雅疏证》中的同义观  

The View of Synonymy in Guangya Shuzheng(《广雅疏证》)

作　　者：盛林[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学文学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第3期71-75,共5页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：以《广雅疏证》为代表的古代同义观与现代同义观迥然不同:后者要求同义词语之间的词义大致相同,而前者只要求同义词语之间具有相同义素。古代同义观重词语之间的语源关系而轻词语之间的类属关系,重直观感觉而轻理性分析。Guangya Shuzheng exemplifies that synonymy is defined differently as time goes on. Now, synonymous words are required to have approximately the same meaning, while in ancient times synonymous words are only required to have the same sememes. In ancient times, synonymy is interpreted according to ety- mology instead of generic relationship and more stress is laid on intuition rather than rational analysis.

关 键 词：《广雅疏证》 同义观 义素相同 语源关系 直观感觉 

分 类 号：H131.4[语言文字—汉语]