检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京积水潭医院,北京市100035
出 处:《中国药房》2009年第15期1121-1123,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:区别传统中药学与生药学的不同,探讨中药的发展方向。方法:比较传统中药学与生药学在理论基础、研究内容、治病原理和鉴别中药质量方面的不同,阐明生药学与传统中药学是完全不同的两个概念。结果:目前中药学被生药学理论束缚,传统中药学有逐渐被西药学理论为基础的生药学所取代的趋势。结论:中药的发展方向需要反思和探讨,现代中药研究应按照中药本身的自然规律去研究,避免按西药开发的模式研究开发中药,而违背中医药的基础理论。OBJECTIVE: To distinguish between the traditional science of Chinese materia medica and the pharmacognosy and discuss the developmental direction of the traditional Chinese medicine. METHODS: The differences between the tradi- tional science of Chinese materia medica and the pharmacognosy in rationale, research contents, medical treatment principles and identification of the quality of the traditional Chinese medicine were compared to clarify that the pharmacognosy and tra- ditional science of Chinese materia medica are completely different concepts. RESULTS: At present, the science of Chinese materia medica is constrained by the theory of pharmacognosy, and the traditional science of Chinese materia medica is tended to be gradually replaced by the western - medicine - theory - based pharmacognosy. CONCLUSION : It is necessary to recon- sider and discuss the developmental direction of the traditional Chinese medicine. Modern research on Chinese medicine should follow the natural laws of the Chinese medicine itself rather than following the development mode of the western medicines.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31