检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐美君[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院
出 处:《法学家》2009年第2期114-123,共10页The Jurist
基 金:作者主持的国家社科基金青年项目<刑事诉讼协商性司法机制研究>(批准号06CFX026)的阶段性成果
摘 要:在德国,辩诉交易制度完全是实践中自发的产物。德国辩诉交易实践的形态、产生、争论及相关司法判决和改革草案的分析表明,辩诉交易已经成为德国解决刑事案件的方式之一,这种方式的出现回应了德国刑事诉讼的特点及其面临的困境,同时也缩小了两大诉讼模式的差距,呈现了世界范围内体系差异而解决方式一致的诉讼规律。德国辩诉交易实践表明,在我国建立基于被告人认罪而迅速结案继而获得刑罚减轻的结案方式成为可能。Plea bargaining in Germany is a totally spontaneous production of the practice. Analysis on the norm, origin, discussion, relevant judicial judgment and reforming draft act on Germany plea bargaining practice demonstrates that plea bargaining becomes one of modes to solve criminal cases in Germany. The mode reflects characteristics of German criminal procedure and dilemma facing to German criminal process. In addition, it lessens the differences between two procedural models and presents the procedural principle of different legal system but the same way to solve cases worldwidely. Germany plea bargaining practice shows that it is probablely to establish the way to settle the case quickly based on the defendant guilty plea and lenient punishment rewards in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117