论外国法查明责任的分配--兼涉外海事审判视角  

On Distribution of Burden of Finding out Foreign Laws

作　　者：向明华[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州大学法学院,广东广州510300

出　　处：《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第3期315-319,共5页Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science

基　　金：2008度年国家社科基金项目(08BFX084)

摘　　要：基于不同的法理念,各国关于外国法查明责任的分配存在较大差异。我国有关外国法查明责任的分配不明确,致使我国涉外海事审判中的外国法律适用工作比较消极被动。基于公正效率原则、当事人处分原则、举证便利原则、司法资源合理配置原则等要求,我国应由当事人承担基础查明责任,但法官应例外地承担若干勤勉的查明责任。For reasons of different law beliefs, it is quite different in the distribution of burden of finding out foreign applicable laws among countries in the world. Since the burden of proofing the foreign law is not clear in China, the application of foreign law in foreign-related maritime trial is quite passive. Based on principles of justness and efficiency, the parties disposition, the convenient sproofing burden and the reasonable distribution of judicial resource, the parties should be burdened with finding out the foreign law, but the judge should also find out some foreign laws diligently on some special occasions.

关 键 词：外国法律 责任分配 涉外海事审判 

分 类 号：D926.23[政治法律—法学] D997