检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段启林[1] 黄树声[1] 赵磊[1] 李伟东[1] 甘露[1] 黄桂晓[1] 曾静[1] 黄东平[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市罗湖医院泌尿外科
出 处:《内蒙古中医药》2009年第3期19-21,共3页Inner Mongolia Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨经皮肾穿刺术在肾囊肿置管硬化的疗效和安全性。方法:B超引导下30例采用直接穿刺单次注入无水乙醇(传统法、A组)、39例采用经皮肾穿刺置管多次注入无水乙醇(改良法、B组),比较两组的疗效和安全性。结果:全部患者治疗后3~12个月进行B超或CT检查随访,A、B两组疗效有显著性差异(P〈0.01),两组安全性均好。结论:改良穿刺置管硬化法治疗肾囊肿的疗效优于传统穿刺硬化法。Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous puncture and catheterization on renal cyst. Methods: This report presented 69 cases of renal cyst, 30 cases were treated with percutaneous puncture (A group) and 39 cases with percutaneous catheterization many times (B group). Results: All the patients were followed up for 3--12 months by B --ultrosonography or CT, striking difference of the therapeutic results were existed(P〈0.01). Conclusion: Percutaneous catheterization is more acceptable than traditional percutaneous puncture treatment for renal cyst.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3