检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安市临潼区人民医院 [2]西安市交大第一附属医院,710600
出 处:《内蒙古中医药》2009年第3期44-45,共2页Inner Mongolia Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较各种方法治疗后鼻孔出血的疗效。方法:110例患者分别采用后鼻孔栓塞、出血点烧灼、动脉结扎、动脉栓塞等方法。结果:110例患者全部治愈无后遗症。结论:后鼻孔栓塞有效率70%,并发症较多;鼻窦内窥镜下烧灼及血管结扎冶愈高,并发症少,值得推广;血管栓塞技术含量高,费用大,基层医院难以开展。Objective: To compare the curative effect of the treatment of posterior nasal hemorrhage with various methods. Method: 110 patienls were treated with posterior nasal embolization, petechia cauterization, artery ligation, and arterial embolization, repectively. Result: All the patients were cured without sequelae. Conclusion: Posterior nasal embolization has many complications with the effective rate of 70% ; petechia cauterization and artery ligation have high curative rate with less complications, which are worth of spreading; with high technology and big costs, vascular embolization is hard to carry out in primary hospital.
分 类 号:R765.3[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63