习惯及其本质的科学解读——重读马克思《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》一文  

Scientific Explanation of Customs and Their Nature——A Retrospection on Marx’s Debate on the Act of Forest Theft

作　　者：张镭[1] 廖颖[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210097 [2]重庆邮电大学法学院,重庆400065

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期41-45,共5页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江苏省哲学社会科学研究项目(07FXB009);司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(07SFB2008);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(07JD820002)

摘　　要：在《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》一文中,马克思的主旨是对主体在客观经济生活中所形成的习惯进行解读,并揭示习惯的法律本质。习惯是主体在客观经济生活中所形成的法权要求的直接反映,其合法性取决于习惯与客观经济生活的契合度。只有在法权的意义上理解习惯的本质,才能真正理解习惯权利和法定权利之间的本质差异,进而提高对法律本质的理解。In Debate on the Act of Forest Theft, Marx aimed at the explanation of customs formed by ontology in objective economic activities, and the revelation of the legislative nature of customs. Customs are the direct reflection of the ontology＇s legislative demands formed in objective economic life, and their validity depends on the agreement between customs and objective economic activities. Only with the help of legal right can we perfectly understand the essential differences between customary rights and legal rights, so as to find out the nature of laws.

关 键 词：习惯 法律 法权 

分 类 号：A811.64[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] D903[政治法律—法学理论]