检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄雪薇[1] 刘桂香[1] 王秀利 吕保祥 郑炎强[1]
机构地区:[1]广东药学院,广州510224 [2]广州市肿瘤医院 [3]广东省生命之光俱乐部
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2009年第1期76-79,共4页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:广东省第1批科技三项经费计划项目资助(2005B30301007).
摘 要:目的研制和测评肿瘤T型心理量表(TP)。方法以规范程序编制量表,随机抽取693例癌症患者进行测定,患者、患者亲属和医护人员做重要性评分,对量表进行筛选和信度、效度等测评,同时706位人口统计学资料与患者类似的健康人填写量表,其结果与患者的结果相比较,以测评区分效度。结果1.最后量表共有39个条目,包括认知习惯、个性特点、情绪表现、潜意识4个维度。2.TP具较好的内容效度,能较贴切地反映与癌症发生有关的心理行为,结构与设计的理论构思相符,参照C型行为量表的效标效度为0.76;患者与健康人群的4个维度均分和总均分均差异有显著性,说明区分效度良好。3.各维度均分和总均分的重测信度分别为0.80,0.76,0.78,0.82和0.83;Cronbach α分别为0.78,0.82,0.93,0.80和0.88;分半信度均为0.89。结论TP具较好的效度和信度,在临床上有一定的实用价值。Objective To develop and evaluate the Turnout Psychological Scale (TP). Methods A self-report questionnaire was developed with structured methods. A total of 639 cancer patients were asked to complete the questionnaire and evaluate the importance of each item. And 129 relatives and 103 doctors and nurses were also asked to evaluate the importance of each item. The questionnaire was refined and its reliability and validity were evaluated. 706 healthy people whose demographics were similar with patients were asked to complete the scale and the results were compared with the patients' results. Results 1. TP was finally refined as a scale with 39-item, 4 dimensions including cognition, personality, emotion and unconscious. 2. The scale had good content validity and it can well reflect the psychological characteristics of cancer patients. Its construct was consistent with the concept designed. The criterion validity with Cancer Behaviors was 0.76. The 4 dimensions and the total score of the patients were significantly different from healthy people' s scores. This shows that the scale has high differ- ential validity. 3. The test-retest coefficients for the 4 dimensions and the total score was 0.80, 0.76, 0.78, 0.82 and 0.83 respectively; Cronbach α was 0.78, 0.82, 0.93, 0.80 and 0.88 respectively. The split-half reliability for the scale was 0.89. Conclusion TP has high validity and reliability. It is applicable in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229