检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院
出 处:《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》2009年第3期32-33,共2页JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
摘 要:典权制度最具有中国传统特色,如何使典权有效融入现今民法体系,并合理保留其原有概念,向来为学者间争议之焦点。基于我国国情的考虑,重建典权制度不仅有其必要性,而且具有可能性,也是完善我国不动产物权制度的需要。就此,探索了中国典权之存在价值及真意,剖析了典权的意义、比较了典权与相似法律制度的异同,阐述了其现代复兴价值,提出了重建典权制度的构想。Of the regulations of the civil code, the pawning right is the typical fight with Chinese traditional characteristics. How to integrate pawning right into today' s civil law system while reasonably keeping its original conception has always remained controversy among the scholars. Given the condition of our country, it is both necessary and feasible to reconstruct pawning system which can perfect the system of real estate. In order to make an exploration of the value and essence of the existing pawning right in China, this article analyses the significance of pawning system , compares the Chinese pawning system with other legal systems. It states that the restorative value of the pawning system and proposes some suggestions about reconstructing the pawning system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74