从专制主义到理想主义——霍布斯、卢梭、黑格尔三种国家观之比较  

From Totalitarianism to Idealism:A Comparison of Three Concepts of Country by Hobbes,Rousseau and Hegel

作　　者：惠黎文[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第2期1-5,共5页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：霍布斯、卢梭、黑格尔分别作为英、法、德资产阶级革命时期最具特色的政治思想代表人物,他们的国家观颇具争议,都曾被冠以专制、极权的名义,但在其精神实质上,却有着根本的不同。这种不同体现在他们各自关于自然状态与自然权利、社会契约说及其国家学说特征的论述上。经由以上诸方面的探究,可以清晰地辨识出这三种国家观所体现的从专制主义到理想主义演进的脉流。Hobbes, Rousseau, and Hegel, respectively in Britain, France and Germany, are the representatives of political and ideological realm in bourgeois revolutionary period. Their concepts of country are rather controversial, which have been called totalitarianism and despotism, but they are fundamentally different in spiritual essence. Such differences reflect in their statements on natural state and natural rights, social contract theory, and the characteristics of their concepts of country. By serious study on the above aspects, we can clearly identify the vein flow from totalitarianism to idealism embodied in the three concepts of country.

关 键 词：霍布斯 卢梭 黑格尔 国家观 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]