论CAFTA争端解决机制的完善  

On the Improvement of the DSM of the CAFTA

作　　者：丁丽柏[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《现代法学》2009年第3期128-134,共7页Modern Law Science

基　　金：2008年度重庆市哲学社会科学规划项目"中国-东盟自由贸易区与开放重庆问题研究"(08FX05)

摘　　要：若以中国——东盟自由贸易区(CAFTA)的自身需求为依托,可以发现学界所认为的其存在的"缺陷"中有许多并非真正缺陷,如未将运用争端解决机制的主体扩展到私主体、临时仲裁庭的设计不合理、争端解决机制的执行力度及惩罚措施不适当等。而该争端解决机制在仲裁员回避、仲裁裁决形成方式及仲裁裁决的复核等方面确实存在不足,应当予以完善。Focusing on the demand of the CAFTA, one can readily find that many of the so-called ＂defects＂ detected by scholars are not defects at all, such as having not extended the disputing parties of the DSM to individuals, the design of ad hoc arbitration, or the enforcement and the punishment of the DSM. However, some flaws of the DSM can be really picked in such aspects as the challenge of the arbitrator, the formation and review of the award, which should be improved.

关 键 词：中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制 适格主体 仲裁制度 执行力度 惩罚制度 

分 类 号：DF96[政治法律—国际法学]